← Back to Journals

Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

Publisher:
—
ISSN:
1842-2845
Category:
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Impact factor:
1

Feed status

5 parsed articles

Last update: Not fetched

Latest articles

Twin Deficits: Apparition or Reality for Albania

2026-03-11

Nevila Mehmetaj, Ermira Kalaj, Ritvana Rrukaj

Twin deficits hypothesis (TDH), supported by the Keynesian approach, implies that an increase in a government’s budget deficit will deteriorate the country’s current account deficit. Numerous empir­ical studies have investigated this approach for in­dividual country case studies as well as for groups of countries in panel data analyses. Therefore, it is the purpose of this study to investigate the twin deficits hypothesis of Albania, a small developing economy in Eastern Europe. An econometric anal­ysis with quarterly data for the period 2008–2022 investigates this relationship, revealing political implications for fiscal policy and country trade im­balances. Empirical results show a unidirectional Granger cause between the budget balance and the current account balance. The vector error correction model finds evidence of the Keynesian twin hypoth­esis in the context of the Albanian economy. There is a long-run positive relationship between the budget deficit and the current account deficit, whereas the results do not hold in the short run. The short-term dynamics reveal a complex interplay where fiscal improvements deteriorate the current account. However, the adjustment factor error correction term stabilizes the short-run dynamics toward the long-run relationship, emphasizing the role of per­sistent coordination among fiscal disciplines and sustained trade imbalances.

When a Stone Breaks the Surface: The Mechanism of Focusing Events in Triggering Response-Oriented Agenda Setting

2026-03-10

Bo Wang, Ying Chen

During the economic and social growth transition, the Chinese government must promptly address and resolve various significant and unexpected so­cial challenges, prioritizing social matters and estab­lishing a response-oriented agenda-setting model. A qualitative comparative analysis method was employed within the response-oriented agenda-set­ting triggering framework, incorporating aspects of advocacy coalition theory. This analysis utilized 45 focusing events from 2018 to 2023 to delineate four response-oriented agenda-setting triggering modes: clear-pointing, government-society interac­tion, event-triggered, and composite mode. Diverse focusing events initiated internal oscillations within the policy subsystem, while high-level government attention allocation prioritized events on the policy agenda, resulting in interactions between primary and secondary coalitions and response-oriented agenda setting influenced by policy learning.

Governance Responses to Urban Sustainability Challenges: Insights from a PSR-Based Coordination Analysis in Guangzhou, China

2026-02-24

Fan Zhang, Siti Rohaida Binti Mohamed Zainal

This study investigates the dynamics of sustain­able urban development in Guangzhou, a rapidly growing megacity in southern China. Using the Pres­ure–State–Response (PSR) model, the research constructs a comprehensive indicator system to assess sustainability performance across econom­ic, environmental, and governance dimensions. Cou­pling coordination analysis is applied to evaluate the degree of synergy among these subsystems from 2013 to 2022, while regression analysis identifies key drivers influencing their alignment. The findings reveal that Guangzhou experienced notable fluctua­tions in sustainability coordination, with policy inter­ventions playing a critical role during periods of high alignment. Economic transformation, infrastructure development, and environmental investment are found to be significant contributors to coordination, while industrial pressure and regulatory lag present persistent challenges. The study highlights the value of integrated assessment frameworks in supporting evidence-based governance and offers insights for other fast-growing cities seeking to balance devel­opment and environmental responsibility under the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Nonprofit Fraud and Organizational Demise: The Role of Governance in Times of Crisis

2026-02-24

Junoh Jeon

This study investigates how organizational fraud impacts the decline of nonprofit organizations, fo­cusing on the role of governance structures during crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic. Analyzing U.S. nonprofits that reported fraud between 2017 and 2019, the results show that 34% of these orga­nizations shut down within three years, compared to only 4.3% of those that did not report fraud. The study highlights key governance factors, such as internal control systems and board oversight, that significantly influence the likelihood of organization­al closure. Strong internal controls were linked to a lower risk of shutdown, emphasizing their protective effect during times of increased uncertainty. Addi­tionally, larger boards were associated with better oversight, which may help prevent organizational failure. The research also emphasizes the impact of organizational size and external funding, with larger nonprofits and those receiving government grants being less likely to close. Overall, the findings un­derscore the essential role of governance and finan­cial support in helping nonprofits endure fraud-re­lated challenges during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Catalyzing Growth: The Strategic Factors and Levers Behind Public Investment Management

2026-02-24

Ramona Mihai, Dan Tudor Lazăr

This article reviews the factors that influence Public Investment Management (PIM) and exam­ines their critical role in long-term benefits of the governmental investments. They are essential for fueling demand, fostering innovation, and address­ing market failures. The article draws on a critical analysis of aca­demic theories and institutional literature including Keynesian economics, Endogenous Growth Theory, Public Goods Theory, and Human Capital Theory and demonstrates the importance of public invest­ments to generate multiplier effects and long-term productivity gains. It also provides an examination of the PIM deter­minants, addressing strategic and operational di­mensions. Key determinants analyzed include insti­tutional capacity and governance, project appraisal and selection, risk management and uncertainty mit­igation, procurement and contract management, po­litical economy and technical capacity. The analysis identifies bottlenecks and enablers of the processes and the importance of these factors for achieving long-term impact. Ultimately, the article discusses that the key determinants affect the efficiency, resilience and fairness of public investments and improving PIM effectiveness requires technical reforms and a sys­temic rethinking of the quality of its governance and delivery.